Overview of Research in Lab of Dr. Rosemery Nelson Gray 1 1. Past

14 Slides90.69 KB

Overview of Research in Lab of Dr. Rosemery Nelson Gray 1 1. Past recent research focused on risk (for psychopathology) and resilience (for coping) produced by BIS (Behavioral Inhibition System) and BAS (Behavioral Activation System) of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory 2. Current research focuses on processes related to borderline personality disorder traits

Borderline Personality Disorder Diagnostic Criteria 2 D S M - I V-T R & D S M - 5

301.83 Borderline Personality Disorder 3 A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following nine diagnostic criteria:

Borderline PD diagnostic criteria 1-4 4 Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment A pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating between extremes of idealization and devaluation Identity disturbance: markedly and persistently unstable self-image or sense of self Impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging (e.g., spending, sex, substance abuse, reckless driving, binge

Borderline PD diagnostic criteria #5-9 5 Recurrent suicidal behavior, gestures, or threats, or self-mutilating behavior Affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood (e.g., intense episodic dysphoria, irritability, or anxiety usually lasting a few hours and only rarely more than a few days) Chronic feelings of emptiness Inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger (e.g., frequent displays of temper, constant anger, recurrent physical fights) Transient, stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms

Typical Lab Research Paradigm 6 1. Participants are undergraduates from the participant pool. 2. Borderline personality traits are examined dimensionally, with participants along a continuum of higher and lower degrees of borderline personality disorder traits. 3. Typically, participants come to our lab and partake of the experimental paradigm on lab computers: A. Pre measures B. Lab manipulation C. Post measures 4. Research questions focus on different processes in those high in borderline personality disorder traits

Past lab studies on relationships and BPD traits 7 Diagnostic criterion #1: Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment Katie Kuhlken thesis: The interaction of BPD symptoms and daily relationship dissatisfaction measures predicted anger (not anxiety nor depression). Anger is noted in Diagnostic Criterion #8 Daily diary method Personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment, 2014, 5, 20-25.

Katie Kuhlken dissertation 8 L I T E R A T U R E R E V I E W : W O M E N W I T H B P D F R E Q U E N T LY PA R T N E R E D W I T H M E N W I T H A N T I S O C I A L O R NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER P A R T I C I PA N T S C O M P L E T E D N E O - P I O N T H E M S E L V E S A N D O N T H E I R PA R T N E R S WOMEN HIGHER IN BPD TRAITS PREFERRED P A R T N E R S S I M I L A R T O T H E M S E LV E S ( S I M I L A R I T Y M O D E L ) ( I N C LU D I N G H I G H N E U R O T I C I S M ) R AT H E R T H A N PA R T N E R S D I S S I M I L A R T O T H E M S E LV E S ( C O M P L E M E N TA R I T Y M O D E L )

Past lab studies on relationships and BPD traits – rejection manipulation 9 Stephanie Skinner’s dissertation Participants either relived a personal rejection experience or a control acceptance experience. Main effect for rejection on 1-9 rating scale (positive to negative) Women higher in BPD traits showed more anger and depression (not anxiety) (on POMS) following a rejection experience. Same effects when Rejection Sensitivity scores were partialled out

Lab studies on the function of romantic relationship in BPD 10 Diagnostic criterion: Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment Why? What is the purpose or function that romantic relationships serve for those high in BPD that makes these relationships so important to them? 1. Questionnaire results, such as Social Provisions Scale 2. Free-form responses, coded for functions 3. Results: Relationships serve similar functions for those across the borderline trait continuum, but participants higher in borderline traits are more anxious or worried about maintaining their relationships (consistent with a large literature that borderlines have insecure attachment patterns) 4. Current study - experience sampling methodology (ESM) –daily data collection on relationship satisfaction and daily relationship functions

Recently completed study– effects of rejection on impulsivity on those higher in borderline traits 11 Alex Birthrong thesis - Undergraduate participants (n 195) were randomly assigned to a social rejection or academic failure task in which they were asked to write about a time when they felt intensely socially rejected, or a time they experienced an academic failure, respectively. A main effect of BPD traits was found for reported risktaking after the social rejection or academic failure (e.g., alcohol use, risky sexual behavior, drug use), more risky performance on a computerized analogue risk-taking task the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), and emotional reactions to the relived event. An interaction between rejection condition and level of BPD traits was found to predict alcohol use, risky sexual behavior, total selfreported risk-taking behavior, and the importance of the relived event. behavior, drug use, other risk-taking behavior (e.g., reckless driving, self-injury), total risk-taking behavior (a composite sum of all self-reported risk-taking behavior scales), BART performance, and emotional reactions to the relived event. All results using a second computerized analogue risk task, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) were nonsignificant. Lastly, and contrary to expectation, a significant interaction between BPD traits and rejection in predicting Profile of Mood States Total Mood Disturbance was not

Recently completed study – effects of “rejection” on tolerance of sexual coercion on those higher in borderline traits 12 Malachi Willis thesis: This study attempted to induce feelings of insecurity about one’s romantic relationship—using a false feedback manipulation—to see if this prime lead to attitudes more tolerant of sexual coercion from a romantic partner, which is a risk factor for intimate partner victimization. Participants were randomly told that they match poorly or highly with their partners. Participants higher in BPD features reported more tolerant attitudes toward sexual coercion. Moreover, there may be a significant interaction between BPD traits and condition. Those in the poorly matched condition expressed more tolerant attitudes toward sexual coercion the higher their borderline features; this association was not present in the highly matched condition. Follow-up analyses investigated various motivations for and approaches to sexual behavior. It appears that those higher in borderline features in the poorly matched condition use sexual behavior to avoid losing their partner or having conflict with their partner.

Current studies in progress (1) 13 1. Experience sampling methodology (ESM) – initial questionnaires (including a borderline measure) and explanation to participants re. ESM methods – daily ratings of relationship satisfaction and rationale for the rating based on common functions of relationships 2. Jake King’s dissertation – effects of inducing a sad mood interacting with emotion dysregulation (borderline traits) in producing response inhibition in cognitive lab tasks (data collection completed) 3. Blake and Shannon – participants with range of borderline traits – reaction to rejection by potential friends vs. potential romantic partners – pilot study completed; follow-up to be conducted

Current studies in progress (2) 14 4. Sudheera – pre-measure of mood and emotion regulation, lab manipulation intended to dysregulate emotion (vs. a control task), post-measure of mood and emotion regulation, lab task intended to assess interpersonal functioning 5. Shannon – pre-measure of mood, lab manipulation intended to awaken prosocial values, post-measure of mood, lab task intended to assess prosocial behavior 6. Morgan –pre-measure of mood, cyberball task intended to manipulate feelings of rejection or not, post-measure of mood, lab task intended to assess emotion dysregulation (Emotion Stroop) 7. Ian – pre-measure of mood, cyberball task intended to manipulate feelings of rejection or not, post-measure of mood, lab task intended to assess impulsivity (Stop Light Driving Task, Balloon Analogue Risk Task)

Back to top button